« Berenson signs extension; Schedule released | Main | Coaches outraged over proposed “always-on icing” »

Proposed NCAA ice hockey rule changes

By Jason Paul | June 11, 2010

The NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Committee is proposing the following rule changes in their continued quest of the pussification of sports:

• Contact to the head will carrying a minimum of a major penalty and a game misconduct or disqualification. “Player safety is critically important to the college hockey community,” said Forrest Karr, chair of the committee and director of athletics at Alaska Fairbanks. “Players will be penalized severely for contact that targets the head and neck.”
• Hybrid icing rule combining the current automatic icing procedure with the touch-up system. According to the article, “In the new model, the official determines which player will reach the puck first, using the faceoff dots as a reference point. If it is determined to be the attacking player, icing is waved off. If it is the defending player, icing is called. A tie goes to the defender.”
• In addition, icing will be enforced throughout the entire game.  In other words, a shorthanded team can no longer ice the puck freely.
• Goalies will switch ends in overtime.
• Removed the obtainable pass rule.
• Altered the delayed-penalty rule so even if the non-offending team scores during the delayed call, they will still get a power play.
• Half shields will not be part of the changes yet.  The committee wants more scientific data before making a recommendation.

First off, contact to the head.  I have a feeling we’re going to be in for a LONG season if that change goes through, much like when checking from behind (in to the boards) became an automatic major penalty.  I can’t say I like it.  I mean, if two guys are battling for the puck along the boards and during their pushing/battling each other one guy’s arm accidentally taps the other guy in the face, is his night now over?  To me, punishment for a penalty should be dependent on the severity of the incident.  This automatic stuff goes a bit over the top sometimes.  If it’s something like that, give him two minutes and move on.  I guess Llewellyn better be careful who he tries to knock down in front of the U-M net after the whistle blows.  Get his hands up too high and his night is done.

Then the question is what next?  Why not make all penalties major penalties?  Kneeing someone can screw up their leg bad. Why’s that not an automatic major? Slashing a guy on his wrist hard can break a bone. How about making all slashes major penalties?  Running a goalie can injure the goalie. Why not make all those majors so players will think twice?  Why just the head?  Why not the rest of the body?  Kind of like the NFL/college football overly protecting any contact on the quarterback, there’s just this general movement in the pussification of sports to make any contact illegal.

I understand contact to the head is a serious issue, but there are different levels of severity of infractions and to group them all in to the same category and award the same level of punishment, personally I don’t like that.  Let refs make a judgment call.

Hybrid icing…fine.

Icing during penalty kills.  Yikes.  College hockey will certainly be going against the grain here as not even the NHL, CHL, or any other league that I know of has made that drastic shift.  According to the article, “This new rule has been used in USA Hockey Player Development Camps.” That’s the only place they mention.

This could either result in a lot of successful power play conversions or a lot of icing calls.  Not to mention how hard it might be to switch your penalty kill unit.  A team who ices the puck can’t switch players.  And if they have to softly clear the zone to avoid icing, the attacking team can quickly corral the puck and send it back up ice to prevent a change or catch them changing on the fly.  Those PK players might end up with some awfully burned out legs.

Last month when the initial list of potential rule changes came out, it was said in the USCHO article that “more than half of those surveyed were against a change there.”  But it was also hinted that the NHL might be looking to change the rule, too.

I am envisioning about 10 icing calls during a penalty kill right now, which will seriously annoy the crap out of everyone.  And I’m talking a minor penalty.  Can you imagine what would happen during a major penalty?

I understand the thought behind the rule change, but the current rule has been the rule for as long as I’ve been alive and I don’t think it’s broken and doesn’t need to be changed. Let the NHL screw this one up.  College hockey doesn’t need to be at the forefront of this change.  Looks like I’m not the only one who feels this way about “always-on icing,” either.  Fans on USCHO’s forum are also ripping the new rule proposals.

Topics: Michigan Hockey, Pussification of sports | No Comments »

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.